
“We can’t practice church discipline if we don’t know who the church members are.” This is one of the most frequently voiced arguments made by those who are proponents of official, formal church membership. One website explains it this way:
“It is also clear that a person can be removed from being ‘in the church.’ Such a formal removal would not be possible if there were no such thing as a clear membership. In other words, Paul’s exhortation [1 Cor 5] would be impossible to obey unless there were a way of determining who is an accountable part of a local body and who is not. Simply put, formal exclusion presupposes formal inclusion. Michael McKinley provides this helpful illustration:
‘I cannot be removed from the Northern California Left Handed Golfer’s Association because I have never been a member of such an organization. Now according to their website, the NCLHGA will remove people from membership for several reasons (like right-handedness, perhaps?). But I am in no danger of being subject to such an action, because you can’t kick a person out who was never a member to begin with.’”1
Continue reading →
